ECONOMICALLY WEAKER SECTIONS (EWS)-


ECONOMICALLY WEAKER SECTIONS (EWS)
Recently, Supreme Court Constitutional Bench upheld validity of 103rd Constitutional Amendment which introduced 10% quota for EWS in education and public employment.

About EWS quota
• EWS reservation was granted based on recommendations of Sinho commission (submitted
report in 2010).
• 103rd Amendment Act 2019 inserted Articles 15(6) and 16(6) in Constitution to provide reservation to EWS among non-OBC and non- SC/ST sections of the population.

* Act enables both central and state governments to provide reservations to EWS.
* However, decision to implement reservations for EWS in state government jobs and educational institutions rests with state governments.
* Act amended Article 15 to additionally permit government to provide for advancement of EWS.
* Further, up to 10% of seats may be reserved for such sections for admission in educational institutions.
*  Such reservation will not apply to minority   educational institutions.
• Act also amended Article 16 to permit the government to reserve up to 10% of all posts for “EWS” of citizens.
• EWS reservation is in addition to existing reservation.
A person not covered under reservation for SCs, STs, and OBCs, and whose family had a gross annual income below Rs 8 lakh, was to be identified as EWS for reservation.
. Also excluded were those who had five acres of agricultural land, or
. A residential flat of 1,000 square feet, or  A residential plot of 100 square yards and above in notified municipalities, or 200 square yards in other areas.

Significance of Judgement
• Reshapes politics of affirmative action:
 EWS quota moves the reservation discussion beyond Mandal debate (weighed in favor of caste reservation).
* In Ram Singh and Ors. vs Union of India case, 2015, SC suggested the need for a non-caste based identification of backward classes.
* Attempt to elevate poor among general category: EWS quota provides economic justice to those who
have not been the beneficiaries of affirmative action like reservation.
* By reading caste alongside class, it reconfigures India’s affirmative action policy by offering an  expansive view.

Concerns related to EWS quota
• Reservation is for social upliftment: Reservation cannot be used as a poverty alleviation measure.
Poverty can be alleviated by other means like scholarships.
• Violates principle of equality: By excluding OBCs, SC/ST communities from EWS, there is a clear violation of equality in their eligibility to avail of a part of the open competition opportunities.
• Issue with income criteria: Income criterion of ₹8 lakh a year has already been questioned as it is liable
to result in excessive coverage of socially advanced classes.
• Tool of populism: Critics have raised concerns about political implications of EWS quota, highlighting its
potential to exacerbate social tensions.

Way Forward 
* A more detailed data and guidelines for identifying most genuine target groups is crucial to ensure that
extremely needy individuals get benefit of this policy.
* Also, government should consider both opening up the EWS quota to all communities and keeping
income criterion much lower than ceiling (can be at same level as income tax slab).
• Continuous evolution of conceptual framework is necessary to ensure that affirmative actions are
increasingly inclusive in capturing backwardness.
• Policies should focus on expanding employment   opportunity for EWS.
• Government should prioritize enhancing the quality of educational institutions to reduce the demand
for reservations and ensure equal access for all students.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Uniform Civil Code (UCC) -

Age of marriage men -women & Prohibition of child marriage act, 2006

Sexual harassment of women

MANIPUR ISSUE

TOP 7 TEMPLES IN UNESCO IN INDIA:-

Mission chandrayaan 3 / mission moon

NATO ( North Atlantic Treaty Organization)